<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t Let Microblogging Kill Macroblogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Pens</title>
		<link>http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Pens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikethoughts.com/?p=96#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I found this post on Google... I seriously thought I&#039;d invented the term &quot;macro-blogging&quot;, but no. It already exists.

RE your post: No worries, the wordy, the wordsmiths, and the bloviators of the blogosphere will never let macro-blogging die :)

As for Twitter, I feel like it can be used to draw traffic to better venue for discussion. So I&#039;m not too worried about it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this post on Google&#8230; I seriously thought I&#8217;d invented the term &#8220;macro-blogging&#8221;, but no. It already exists.</p>
<p>RE your post: No worries, the wordy, the wordsmiths, and the bloviators of the blogosphere will never let macro-blogging die <img src='http://mikethoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for Twitter, I feel like it can be used to draw traffic to better venue for discussion. So I&#8217;m not too worried about it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Templeton</title>
		<link>http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikethoughts.com/?p=96#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Gene, you&#039;re exactly right. I didn&#039;t use the favorite-ing feature much on Twitter when I first got started, but now I&#039;ve been using it relentlessly to save links to important articles I want to go back and read later or for comments/posts I feel I should go out and respond to.

I&#039;ve certainly been racking up a lot of those types of tweets, but now the issue is getting back out there and &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; responding to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene, you&#8217;re exactly right. I didn&#8217;t use the favorite-ing feature much on Twitter when I first got started, but now I&#8217;ve been using it relentlessly to save links to important articles I want to go back and read later or for comments/posts I feel I should go out and respond to.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve certainly been racking up a lot of those types of tweets, but now the issue is getting back out there and <em>actually</em> responding to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Blishen</title>
		<link>http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Blishen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikethoughts.com/?p=96#comment-47</guid>
		<description>How true, and your comment about good discussion topics going to waste because of the 140 character limit. A few months ago I started to highlight tweets that would be an idea or thought that could be extended or followed up. Right now I am up to 512. I see you are at 216 so am wondering if you favourites also fall into that category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How true, and your comment about good discussion topics going to waste because of the 140 character limit. A few months ago I started to highlight tweets that would be an idea or thought that could be extended or followed up. Right now I am up to 512. I see you are at 216 so am wondering if you favourites also fall into that category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Webb</title>
		<link>http://mikethoughts.com/2009/01/30/dont-let-microblogging-kill-macroblogging/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikethoughts.com/?p=96#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Great! Looking forward to seeing more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Looking forward to seeing more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
